The KP Interpretation Framework

From a question to an interpretation

A structured KP analysis begins with a clearly defined event and a reproducible chart. The primary cusp anchors the subject; supporting houses describe its components. The cuspal sub-lord and event significators provide the central relationships, followed by period and transit comparisons where used.

1. Define the question and the outcome being considered.
2. Record the inputs and exact calculation settings.
3. Identify the primary cusp and supporting houses.
4. Trace the cuspal sub-lord and relevant stellar relationships.
5. Build the significator structure, including node representation.
6. Record both supporting and competing connections.
7. Compare eligible periods and the adopted timing conditions.
8. Add sign descriptions as a separate contextual layer.
9. Retain the reasoning and any remaining uncertainty.

Descriptions and decisions

Elements, modes and morphology may describe symbolic style or context. They should remain distinguishable from the house relationships used to assess an event. The description of a communication-oriented environment, for example, is different from a conclusion about receiving a particular job offer.

Case records

An illustrative chart differs from a real case. A retrospective analysis has the outcome already known; a prospective judgment was recorded before it. These distinctions affect how a claim of accuracy can be assessed.

A useful record preserves the original event definition, period window, conflicting indications and observed result. This allows the interpretation to be reviewed without silently changing the target after the outcome.